In morality we experience the world as binding desire and announcing an order to which we must be conformed. This order is not as a factual given like “we only have so much money to finish the study”, since I can desire my monetary constraints weren’t there and work to eliminate them, but part of being a moral constraint is to the need to accept it and to never work against it. The technocratic is in the service of desire while the moral is a constraint upon desire. Outside heaven, what good is a morality that only commands what everyone was already doing and wanted to do?
It’s easy enough to see why we are in love with what extends our will and fulfills it more perfectly, but the flip side of this is recognizing the aversion we have to what restricts will and put it under constraint. The first sort of fact will get praised forever for all its wonders and benefits, and how it has thrown the light on all the plain facts of the world. But all the praise we heap on it should alert us to a temptation we have to ignore, downplay, or dismiss as subjective the facts which are just as plain but which push back against desire and deny it something it wants.
10 Lies Acton Asceticism charity consumerism covid-19 Discipleship Donald Trump economic ethics Economics Evangelism Faith forgiveness Freedom Free market Friendship Great Lent 2018 Great Lent 2019 homily Humility income inequality Jesus Prayer lay discipleship lay formation lay spiritual formation lay vocation liturgy Love mercy National Review Obedience OST Politics Prayer property rights prudence racism religious liberty Repentance retreat notes Violence Vocation Wealth wisdom Youth Ministry