Religious Freedom and the HSS Mandate

Michael Matheson Miller at Acton writes:

What would Diedrich Bonhoeffer have to say about the HHS mandate? Eric Metaxas–best selling author of the biographies on William Wilberforce and Bonhoeffer:Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy gives us some insight in this 2 minute video that explains the real issue behind the HHS Mandate: Religious liberty

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Cardinal George criticizes Sebelius’ declaration of “war on citizens”

(Insightscoop) Francis Cardinal George of Chicago, in his June 17, 2012, column in Catholic New World, writes:

Our current economic problems and political impasses bear devastating witness to a society obsessed with controlling every aspect of experience and life. This drive is deadly and destroys trust, which is betrayed in order to advance one’s own projects. Belief in Christ’s presence and in God’s providence, by contrast, frees people to trust that they can take care of those whom God has given them to love without fear of losing their deepest selves. Devotion to the Blessed Sacrament and to the Sacred Heart of Jesus places us within the safety of God’s infinite love and gives us courage to risk our own lives for the salvation of others. Faith makes us free. As everyone knows, freedom to express our faith through the public ministries of the church is now outlawed Contesting the current HHS mandate in which the government usurps the right to determine which of our ministries are truly “religious” and which are not is a series of lawsuits being brought by dioceses and universities and other Catholic organizations. That it is necessary is clear in a declaration from Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, quoted in many of the plaintiffs’ legal briefs, that “We are at war.” So far as I know, this is the first time that a U.S. government official has declared war on citizens of the United States who do not agree with government policy. The public conversation continues to be manipulated by the government and many in the media, hiding what is at stake in the mandate to strip religious institutions of their identity so that they can be forced to act against their religious beliefs.

Read the entire column.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Religious freedom, freedom of conscience

Let’s keep something clear. My role as a priest, and the bishops’ role as bishops, is to form and support the laity for their proper role in the public square. It is the role of lay people to shape the world around them according to their vocations. I (or, even more, the bishops) will teach, give you the sacraments, and support you. The work of the public square is really your work, lay people, not mine. Remember that when you think bishops aren’t being strong enough in the public square. We clerics know that you lay people often face in your daily lives challenges that would make many of us roll up in a ball and hide under the covers. On the other hand, the Enemy of your soul hates priests and bishops with surpassing malice. We live every day knowing that we go to our judgment with Holy Orders upon our souls and to those to whom God has given much, more will be expected. As Augustine said, “I am a bishop for you, but I am a Christian with you.” Neither portion of God’s poor little servants should fall into the trap of thinking that the other has anything easy in life.

***

For years now we have been subject to the pro-abortion mantra, “it is my body and my choice” (and of course we believe that is incorrect as there are other lives — other bodies — at stake), but now it seems the mantra must be, “it is my body, my choice, on your dollar.”

Read the rest of Bishop Robert Morlino’s essay here.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

It Is the Person, Not Just the Principle

Catholics for the Common Good
From: Catholics For The Common Good

Full text of address given by William B. May to the Stand Up For Religious Freedom Rally in front of the HHS Region Nine Headquarters in San Francisco, March 23, 2012. Over 1,000 people attended.

by William B May

A few years ago, Father Michael Sweeney, president of the Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology in Berkeley told a group of us, “If you are going to die for something, never die for a principle, only die for another person.” We have been pondering this every since as we reflect on the causes we fight for.

Now, Fr. Sweeney wasn’t saying that principles are not important – they guide society and guide government. But the reason we fight for principles is the good of the human person – each having infinite value and dignity.

The First Amendment is supposed to protect us from the tyranny of government forcing us to violate our consciences formed by our faiths. But it is important to remember, the reason we don’t want to violate our consciences is not just a matter of principle, but a matter of not wanting to do what we know will cause harm to other people. The harm could be physical, emotional, or spiritual – it does not matter.

Archbishop designate William Lori recently used the analogy for the HHS mandate of the government forcing Jewish delis to violate Jewish dietary laws because customers want a pork sandwiches. To someone not familiar with or having respect for the Halakah they may not think that is a big deal, but for an observant Jew keeping kosher is a response – a participation in a covenant with Almighty God. It is beautiful. It has a deep spiritual significance and value. To force someone to violate that covenant, is to do harm to the person.

Religions provide a moral voice in society to help us resist the temptation to make laws to merely suit ourselves. By helping us know right from wrong and what causes spiritual, physical or emotional harm to another, our faith teaches us to fight for a just society.

Not everyone agrees on what is right or wrong, and today we have too many laws that provide people with the freedom to do harm to other people. Many believe the value of the person is determined by their ability –a disabled person has no right to live if the disability is detected before they are born. People are free to create children with the intention of depriving them of their fundamental human right to know and, as far as possible, be cared for by their mothers and fathers.

But we are not here today to debate what is right or wrong. The question is whether anyone should be compelled by the power of government, by the President of the United States to promote and pay for what we know will cause harm to our brothers and sisters. While medical schools have long since taken this phrase out to the Hippocratic oath, no matter what, based on what we know to be true and good, “we will do no harm.”

Turning to the HHS Mandate, some of us know, when chemicals are given to healthy women to make them unhealthy to the point that they cannot sustain and support the human life growing within them, this causes harm. People can disagree and debate whether ending a human life is harmful, but for those who know it, don’t force us to do it, don’t force us to promote it, don’t force us to pay for it. We will do no harm!

We know that mutilating healthy persons to make their reproductive systems unhealthy for no medical reason does harm. People can disagree and debate whether human mutilation causes harm, but for those who know it causes harm, don’t force us to do it, don’t force us to promote it, don’t force us to pay for it. We will do no harm!

While we Christians are commanded to love our neighbors, our brothers and sisters, President Obama commands us to do what we know will cause harm. We will cause no harm!

All we are seeking, Mr. President, is the freedom to do no harm. You can fine our institutions – our hospitals and schools – you can send your marshals to shut them down, but when you do, you will find us standing in the doorway, arm and arm. Why? Because we will do no harm!

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 9.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

MercatorNet: How hedonism became America’s official religion

Jennifer Roback Morse, PhD, the founder and president of the Ruth Institute, a project of the National Organization for Marriage, makes the argument-convincingly I think-that America now has “a new state religion.” This new faith is “Secular Hedonism, the worldview that sex is a sterile recreational activity, with babies thrown in as an afterthought, an optional extra, for people with quirky life-style preferences. ” How did this come to pass you ask? Through the HSS contraceptive mandate that “uses the full might of the US government to scrub the public square clean of any competing religious voices that dissent from the new orthodoxy.”

Read the whole of Morse’s argument here.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)