More than Mere Economics

Regnery Publishing (2012), $27.95

Roman Catholic priest and founder of the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, Fr Robert Sirico has done his readers a great service in laying out the moral foundations of the free market. Whether the reader agrees with him or not (and I do agree with him), his new book Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy helps clarify why the free market is not simply a useful but a morally good.   This is, as he points out at the beginning of the book, a daring argument to make.

Daring though the argument is, especially for a Catholic priest, it is also essential that it be made since for too many people (including business people), free market economic theory and policies are little more than a justification for greed.  While not denying the excesses of capitalism and real sins of capitalists, Fr Sirico wisely doesn’t allow sin to have the last word. Rather, and like St Augustine who inspired his own spiritual journey, he helps us see the goodness hidden beneath the distorting effects of moral failure.

Though irenic in tone, Sirico is unwilling to cede ground to those who imagine—wrongly in his view—that “socialism, liberalism, collectivism, and central planning” (p. 185) are morally superior and more effective in generating wealth. They aren’t and however noble the intention they are come up morally and practically short because they neither anthropological sound nor effective in caring for the material needs of the human person. The latter is especially the case when we turn to the needs of the most vulnerable among us. It is the free market that best fits the truth of the human person. And it is only the free market that has demonstrated the ability not only to lift the human person out of the poverty that was the almost universal lot of humanity even as late as 200 years ago.

But is the moral argument that is at the heart of the book’s.

Absence of a clear understanding of the moral foundations of the free market, policy disagreements turn into little more than shouting matches between those jockeying for their own advantage.  If we have any hope of transcending mere selfish self-interest we must understand the end—or moral goal—of our economic activity and so our public policies. To do this we must understand what it means to be human in full.

For the answer to what it means to be fully human, Sirico turns to the Judeo-Christian tradition. He does so because it is his “own tradition” and it is also the “tradition that I know best I know best, doctrinally and historically, and it goes without saying that I have a special appreciation for its social contributions and its theological truth claims (to which I’ve dedicated my life).” That said, he continues,

I do not mean to suggest that this tradition is the exclusive contributor to the development and maintenance of economic freedom. The trick, it seems to me, is to be able to identify on the one hand the unique and undeniable contribution that Judeo-Christian revelation and anthropology played in the institutional development of liberty in the world, and yet not to close the door on how the truths about human liberty can be understood—discernible as they are through the natural reason—in other philosophical or theological contexts. In the end, of course, that is not my task or competency. I leave that to others more qualified and knowledgeable about how this would play itself out in, for example, a Hindu or Islamic context” (p. 186).

In saying this, Fr Sirico offers a testimony to the true power of the ideas he defends. Freedom and liberty are only possible when we love of truth and live lives of virtue. Those persons and communities who live this way are truly free and, as a sign of their freedom, can be both fearless and generous in the face of even substantive differences.

More than a book on that defends the moral foundation of the free market, Fr Sirico offers us a primer on a life well lived. It just so happens that he does so while discussing economics.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 5.5/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: -1 (from 5 votes)

Asceticism and the Consumer Society: An Interview with Metropolitan Jonah

(Religion & LibertyThe Orthodox Church is mostly known in the United States for its rich liturgical life, its adherence to ancient calendars for major Christian feast-days and, perhaps most of all, the many food and ethnic festivals offered by its multiethnic parishes. Social activism and moral witness in the public square, not so much. That has begun to change with the rise of Metropolitan Jonah, the primate of the Orthodox Church in America. This youthful bishop, born James Paffhausen in Chicago and raised in Southern California before entering monastic life in Russia, was elected to lead the OCA in November 2008. Since then, he has perhaps been the most widely quoted and covered Orthodox bishop in the United States, speaking out on social issues and traveling widely to speak to ecumenical gatherings. He delivered one of the keynote addresses at Acton University in June 2011. Religion & LibertyExecutive Editor John Couretas spoke with Metropolitan Jonah about his talk.


R&L: In your Acton University address, “Asceticism and the Consumer Society,” you explained how the consumerist impulse was really an addictive impulse, something that compels us fill a void where God should be. And we so frequently attempt to fill that empty spot with the wrong things.

Metropolitan Jonah: I think the void occurs because we’re basically distracted from God, and we don’t let God fill that void. We don’t have that focus and that perpetual intuitive awareness of God for which we were created, and so we let other things get in the way. And for many people, it’s pain and disappointment, discouragement, anger, bitterness, all of the passions. For others, it could be the pain that follows from having been abused in some way. And so this becomes a kind of a preoccupation and we look for things to mute that pain, to distract us from it. We look for a salve.

R&L: Would you say that these passions, these addictions, have a similar cause?

Metropolitan Jonah: All addictive behaviors are the same, essentially. They are rooted in the same kind of phenomenon, this avoidance of inner pain. It could be consumerism and a constant preoccupation with acquisition of things, as if more stuff could make us happy. Or it could be the resort to abusing alcohol or drugs or sex in the same way.

R&L: In your talk, you offered some reflection on how this distraction not only pulls us away from God, but reduces us to something less than fully human. What is the key to living out our full humanity as Christians in this highly secularized world?

Metropolitan Jonah: I believe the real key is that whole complex of relationships that we find, first and foremost, in the family and then in the broader community. But our relationship with God, of course, takes primacy even before the family. All of our other relationships find their place within that relationship with God, because it’s precisely that which actualizes our personhood. We can be autonomous individuals but that doesn’t mean that we’re authentically persons, in the sense of having that real meaning and vision of our lives rooted in God and rooted in the other. Without God, our personhood becomes a kind of a self definition.

At AU 2011, Metropolitan Jonah talks with R&L Executive Editor John Couretas.

R&L: And self-definition also promotes the idea of self-sufficiency, does it not?

Metropolitan Jonah: Yes, it’s a delusion of self-sufficiency and a delusion of complete autonomy. And none of us is autonomous, ultimately. We don’t come into being simply by ourselves, nor can we live simply by ourselves. Which opens the way to sin and depersonalization. That’s what sin does to us. It’s what these addictive behaviors do, because they isolate us.

****

R&L: You referred to Father Alexander Schmemann’s famous definition of secularism as the negation of worship, as the negation of man as a worshipping being. Could you tell us how Schmemann’s insights will help us navigate the high secular world we live in now?

 

Metropolitan Jonah: Well, the way I explain what Father Schmemann taught about secularism is compartmentalization. And by that I mean the compartmentalization of our lives and to a great degree, it’s about the compartmentalization of God into a little box where we can access Him when we care to, but really most of the time we ignore him. We’re trying to put God into a place where we can control Him. What that does is fundamentally distort the intuitive reality, or the intuitive awareness of God, Who is present at all times and everywhere. This is how we understood Him in our original state, the state in which we were created to be and from which we fell. This secularization is basically rooted in a kind of dualism of excluding or separating God from His creation, the material world. And it’s precisely in the reality of God’s presence in every aspect of the material world and that intuitive awareness of Him shining forth in and through the creation that’s the real core of the whole sacramental vision of reality.

***

R&L: In your talk, you also touched on the rise of Christianophobia, which describes the process of pushing the faith witness out of the public square. This has been going on for some time. It seems though that even some Christians have absorbed this view, preferring to keep faith a private matter. What do you make of this?

Metropolitan Jonah: That’s precisely compartmentalization. And it’s the compartmentalization of the Church and its witness into simply one more interest group, another lobbying entity, with all views of equal weight and simply a matter of opinion. Now obviously I’m not arguing for some kind of a unified church-state with a single official view. That can also take you to a very secularized place, as a matter of fact. But people of faith are informed by not simply doctrines and dogmas, but by that living consciousness that God is and that our lives are dependent on Him. And that changes one’s entire worldview and stands in sharp contrast to the views of those who believe there is no God or He is not present and our lives are not dependent on Him. That’s the fundamental difference. And so while an authentic faith witness is not going to come out in any kind of great official pronouncements from some kind of central authority, we can work toward a common vision that is arrived at by people of a common mind.

R&L: You’re talking about an ethic, a culture that you live it out. It’s not just talking about these things, but it’s embodied and experienced in relationship to Christ.

Metropolitan Jonah: And I would also say more broadly that I’m talking about people of faith, who are also Jews and who are Muslims. Not just Christians. They have a witness to share, too, and in our society I think we can mix common cause with them in many areas. Because it’s a matter of a living perception of God. Now, we can disagree about some of the specifics. For Christians, our perception of God is always in terms of Jesus Christ. For a Jew or a Muslim, their perception of God is not through Christ. Yet, they still have a very powerful perception of God. With Christians, they would share a belief that God informs all of their moral and ethical decisions.

Read the whole interview here: Asceticism and the Consumer Society: An Interview with Metropolitan Jonah.

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 8.2/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

Orthodox Christians in the Public Square

In the fourth and final foundational class at Acton University (“FND 401 Scriptural Foundations of a Free and Virtuous Society”), the presenter Dr Stephen J Grabill argues that there are two missteps we need to avoid as we try and work through the practical relationship between politics and religion: separatism and fusion.  Both he said misunderstand how the  Christian tradition sees the relationship of Church and State.

Whether religious or secular, from the left or the right, those who espouse separatism think that mixing politics and religion is dangerous.  Some think politics will corrupt religion. Others think that religion will corrupt politics. While in the current American context separatism tends to take on a liberal and secular form, it is not a position exclusive to liberal or secular thinkers; conservatives too have argued for a separation.  Grabill points out that given the long, and at times disastrous, history of religious involvement in politics, there is a rough wisdom in all this.  Too frequently Christians forget that the Church is “given only the persuasive power of the Word, not the coercive power of the sword.”

Equally wrong, and in my view often more harmful, is the fusionist position. Here we see politicized religion or religionized politics. This is a disaster for both and leads to a situation in which politics gets raised from “penultimate, to ultimate, significance.”  When Christians fuse religion and politics we corrupt the Gospel.  In such a situation it is easy for the politically active Christian to give the impression that salvation in Jesus Christ is only for those with the correct political opinion.

Mindful of what we ought not to do, how then, Grabill asks, are we to move from doctrine to policy? Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Virtue, Economics and Our Life Together

What I want to focus on with you the distinction Jennifer Roback Morse made in her lecture (“Economic Way of Thinking”) between two different, though I think related, approaches to the study of economic. We can understand our economic life in terms of scarcity or in terms of exchange.

The former is typically the way economics is taught and researched. Especially in a postlapsarian world, that is the creation as it has been marred by Adam’s sin, such scarcity is a given. The latter model, economics as the study of exchange or trade, is less common approach at least among contemporary scholars.  Morse argues that we make ourselves better by mutual exchange and that if exchange doesn’t make me better off I won’t (absent compulsion) make the trade. From this she draws the conclusion that profit, at least from free mutual exchange, is not only not unjust it is morally good. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

The Goals and Limits of Politics

Returning to an earlier post (here), what are we to do when as Orthodox Christians we disagree about politics or social policy? Answering this question requires that we first understand, or at least try to understand, why we disagree. To give at least a provisional answer I want to turn to the second lecture at Acton University, “Christianity and the Idea of Limited Government,” given by Michael Miller, a research fellow and the media director at the Acton Institute.

Following Aristotle, Miller argues that understanding our political life requires that we have a correct understanding of the goal of human life. As with the previous lecture by Samuel Gregg, our anthropology—our vision of human life—is key to how we understand life together as citizens.  Seen in this light, we need to ask to what degree, if at all, do disagreements about politics and public policy reflect differences in our understandings in what makes for a life of human flourishing? Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Christian Anthropology, Politics and Contemporary Society

At the conclusion of his lecture on Christian anthropology (see the notes here) Acton Institute’s director of research Samuel Gregg asks how, in light of the Christian understanding of the person, are we to live? He develops this question along four lines:

  1. How much does our society reflect Christian anthropology rather than some other anthropological vision?
  2. What would a society formed according to Christian anthropology look like?
  3. What must we do practically to accomplish this?
  4. How do we respect the freedom of those who disagree with our anthropology while insisting that as Christians we have a role to play and a voice in the public square?

Not unreasonable, one of the attractions of religion (or a political ideology for that matter) is hope that we will find answers to these and similar questions.  But as Gregg’s questions also suggest, we can’t expect universal agreement with the answers we offer. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

More from Acton

Later this week I will post my notes from Acton University. The class content was uniformly excellent and touched on themes that are important not only for contemporary society (both in America and internationally) but also for the Orthodox Church as we try to navigate in an increasingly secular culture.

Though it only took a minute or so to do, I have converted the text of Metropolitan Jonah’s talk (“Asceticism and the Consumer Society”) to a pdf. If you are interested in reading it, please feel free to download it here.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Why Acton?

Last week I attended Acton University in Grand Rapids, MI.  In addition to the blessing of hearing Metropolitan Jonah’s keynote, I also participated in classes that explored (in the words of AU’s website) “the intellectual foundations of a free society.”  What was unique about the conferences was that it provided me, and all the participants, the “opportunity to … integrate rigorous philosophy, Christian theology and sound economics.” While this made the trip more than worth my time, I want to highlight the pastoral value I found in the event.

There is a great need in the Orthodox Church for the laity to understand the importance of marriage, family life and their work in the market place.  Far from making them second class Christians or being a distraction to a life of Christian holiness, marriage, family life and work are the arenas within which the laity fulfill their baptismal vocation.  Through formal classes and informal discussions, Acton University offers participants a framework within which to address positively the role of the laity in the sanctification of the world through their fidelity to Christ.  Key to such an understanding is the consistent emphasis throughout the week that fidelity to Christ is more than just a matter of shaping our personal lives according to the Gospel. Participation in the sacramental life of the Church, personal prayer and fasting are all essential. But it is also necessary that Orthodox Christians manifest the fruits of holiness in the home, in school, in the marketplace and in the larger culture. As an Orthodox priest, I think that Acton University can play an important role in helping the laity do this and I would encourage interested laity and clergy to attend.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 5.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Finding the Balance: Privacy and the Civil Society – The Acton Institute

Privacy in our culture has come to serve not a deepening of community life but an ever deeper sense of social isolation. Even otherwise laudable behavior is increasingly justified not by the goodness of what is done but by the modern sense of privacy. Even among those who ought to know better, the Gospel is presented in terms that are almost wholly personal without any sense of its public character and demands. Our sense of isolation from each other has become so profound that even to suggest that there is a human nature and that true happiness is only possible when we live in conformity to our nature, is seen a provocation and an assault on the radical autonomy of the individual.

Paradoxically, when privacy is in the service of isolation it is also the source of what Peggy Noonan (The Eyes Have It) describes as our increasingly “exhibitionist culture.” She writes that more and more we “know things about each other (or think we do) that we should not know, have no right to know, and have a right, actually, not to know.” While technology has a role to play here, Noonan sees the cause as rooted in the loss of what I would call the right sense of personal privacy. Lose this, Noonan says, and “we lose some of our humanity; we lose things that are particular to us, that make us separate and distinctive as souls, as, actually, children of God.” And with this loss comes as well the loss of a truly civil society. “We also lose trust, not only in each other but in our institutions, which we come to fear. “

Not that the modern sense of privacy is all bad. Without privacy, without a door I can close (and the trust that you will respect that closed door) I cannot from time to time withdraw into solitude. Rightly understood, privacy is the functional expression of solitude. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Sectarian or Catholic? Thoughts From Another Long Drive

Another long drive last week gave me a chance to listen to an excellent lecture on the tradition of Catholic social encyclicals.  The lecturer, Kishore Jayabalan (director of  the Acton Institute’s Rome office) made a distinction between a Catholic and a sectarian approach to the surrounding culture.

While it is important for us as Christian to distinguish truth from error, Jayabalan argues that a sectarian approach limits itself to what is wrong with others.  Whether from the right or the left, sectarianism is an ideology masquerading as Christian theology.  Again this is not to say that Christians ought should refrain from pointing out where we disagree with the culture–we should but a purely negative approach is not only insufficient it contradicts the very tradition that we would defend.  Let me explain. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 9.3/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)