Liturgy and Elections

Earlier today, I read Fr Patrick Henry Reardon’s pastoral letter “This Year’s Election” (you can download the pdf here). Like Fr Patrick, if it is at all possible I avoid discussions on partisan politics. The only exception is on those issues  where the Church has clearly spoke. I think Father has identified three of these areas.

First, the origin of human rights. These, since they come directly from the hand of God, are determined by the moral law. That is to say, no political institution can give citizens a right to do something wrong—not the Constitution, not the Congress, not the Supreme Court.

Second, the unborn child in the womb has an absolute right to be born. This right, which comes from God, is subject to no qualifying circumstances, including the conditions of the child’s conception and the health of the mother. One may not murder an unborn baby. A baby in the womb has the same right to life as its mother and her doctor.

Third, marriage is the union of a man and woman. This principle, rooted in God’s creating act, can be altered by no decision of any institution or agency of government. No one can be given a right to do a wrong. Whatever name is conferred upon it, state-sponsored sodomy is an abomination to the created order. It is a radical offense against the divine Logos.

Unfortunately, this puts the Church in a more critical posture toward the Democratic Party. We shouldn’t however assume from this that the Republican Party is somehow the “Orthodox” choice or that its policies are exempt from criticism. Much less can we assume that one party and not the other has received the Church’s blessing. In fact,

About policies—most questions of political concern—we may expect some legitimate disagreements among Christians. Among these we should include questions about the application of civil punishments, the funding of public education, the tax code, the authority of federal agencies, this or that social program, and so forth. These matters, properly governed by prudence, leave much room for legitimate disagreements among Christians.

But, there are “matters on which there can be no legitimate disagreement among Christians.” And this places Orthodox Christians I think in a difficult position. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 1.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Christian Values Aren’t Enough

Parents who raise their children with nothing more

English: Christus Pantocrator in the apsis of ...

Christus Pantocrator in the apsis of the cathedral of Cefalù.

than Christian values should not be surprised when their children abandon those values. If the child or young person does not have a firm commitment to Christ and the truth of the Christian faith, the values will have no binding authority, nor should we expect that they would. Most of our neighbors have some commitment to Christian values, but what they desperately need is salvation from their sins. That does not come by Christian values, no matter how fervently held. Salvation comes only by the Gospel of 

Jesus Christ.

Human beings are natural-born moralists, and moralism is the most potent of all the false gospels. The language of “values” is the language of moralism and cultural Protestantism — what the Germans called Kulturprotestantismus. This is the religion that produces cultural Christians, and cultural Christianity soon dissipates into atheism, agnosticism, and other forms of non-belief. Cultural Christianity is the great denomination of moralism, and far too many church folk fail to recognize that their own religion is just Cultural Christianity — not the genuine Christian faith

Read more  Albert Mohler.

Substitute “Cultural Orthodoxy” for “Cultural Christianity” and I think it applies. Does this mean that culture doesn’t matter or that we shouldn’t work to bring society into a ever closer harmony with the Gospel? Of course not! Important, essential really, though culture is, it is not sufficient for salvation. And this applies to both those Orthodox Christians who are cultural conservatives as well as to those who are cultural progressives. That I can justify theologically my cultural or political views is not to suggest that these views exhaust the mystery of salvation. Rather the best I can say is that my views are compatible with the Gospel.

Thoughts?

In Christ,+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Democratic Platform Includes Free Abortions, Official ‘Gay Marriage’ Support

Quote

(Source: Catholics For The Common Good).

By Michelle Bauman

Charlotte, NC, Sep 5, 2012 (CNA/EWTN News)– For the first time in American history, a major U.S. political party has incorporated support for a redefinition of marriage into its official statement of beliefs.

The Democratic Party’s platform, formally adopted at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. on Sept. 4, supports “marriage equality,” a phrase used by those who wish to redefine marriage to include homosexual couples.

The platform, which outlines the party’s official views on a variety of subjects, called for the full repeal of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman for federal purposes and protects states from being forced to recognize the gay unions of other states.

It also called for the passage of the so-called Respect for Marriage Act, which would require the federal government to recognize same-sex “marriages.”

While the document voiced support for the freedom of “churches and religious entities” to determine how “marriage as a religious sacrament” should be administered, it did not include any mention of individuals or groups that hold religious objections to recognizing and supporting civil marriage.

It also noted that the administration has redefined the word “family” in immigration regulations to include homosexual relationships.

Affirming its support of abortion with no restrictions, a redefinition of marriage and free birth control for all women, the Democratic Party said in its official statement of positions that it is committed to “pursuing policies that truly value families.”

The platform also recognized the importance of good fathers and noted President Obama’s initiatives to support and encourage fatherhood.

“We all have a stake in forging stronger bonds between fathers and their children,” it said.

The president has drawn criticism for acknowledging the irreplaceable role of fathers while at the same time undermining this important role by supporting “same-sex marriage,” which renders fathers unnecessary and optional.

The Democratic platform also removed references to “God” but noted that faith-based organizations have played a “central” role throughout American history. It called for “constitutionally sound, evidence-based partnerships with faith-based and other non-profit organizations to serve those in need and advance our shared interests.”

“There is no conflict between supporting faith-based institutions and respecting our Constitution,” the document said, “and a full commitment to both principles is essential for the continued flourishing of both faith and country.”

At the same time, the party voiced its support for the controversial federal mandate that requires employers to offer health care plans that include free contraception, sterilization and early abortion-inducing drugs, even if doing so violates their consciences.

Widely criticized for its infringement upon conscience rights and freedom of religion, the mandate has drawn the opposition of individuals and organizations from across the religious and political spectrum, including objections from bishops in every Catholic diocese in the U.S.

However, the Democratic Party’s official statement of beliefs argued that the president “has respected the principle of religious liberty” in promoting “affordable family planning services.”

The party reiterated its commitment to “safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay” and opposed any restrictions or attempts to “weaken or undermine that right.”

In addition, it observed that Obama issued an executive order to repeal restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research and voiced support for “evidence-based and age-appropriate sex education,” although it did not elaborate on which types of sex education it considers to meet these criteria.

The platform also said that America must advance its “core set of universal values” around the world.

“President Obama and the Democratic Party are committed to supporting family planning around the globe,” it said, highlighting the president’s decision to overturn the Mexico City Policy, which bans U.S. funds from supporting foreign family planning groups that promote or perform abortions.

Insisting that “gay rights are human rights,” the party also said that the State Department is currently “funding a program that finances gay rights organizations” and vowed to “actively combat” the actions of other nations that it believes are engaged in “discrimination.”

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

New Orthodox Site: SmartVote

There’s a new Orthodox site up to help generate reflection and conversation for the forthcoming US Presidential election. While the content isn’t necessarily something I always agree with, I thought it might interest some folks. Please take a look at SmartVote.com and let them (and me!) know what you think!

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

SmartVote in their own words:

Piercing the Fog…

The fog was created by the failure our of our national and local media to present to the American people a clear picture of the problems we are facing politically, morally and economically, instead obscuring essential facts with a cloud of disinformation, because of their establishment and interests in Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and New York, and their friendships and philosophical alliance with one side of the debate, the side of the status quo.

We at SmartVote aim to pierce this “political fog” by gathering in one place tools to put into your hands for navigating the current political map of our country so that you can make better informed voting decisions.

We believe the key is for Americans of all backgrounds to be re-anchored in the design and philosophy of our unique form of government, the most stable and freedom-protecting in the world, that has benefited us for over 200 years.  To do this we want to reacquaint you with our founding principles so that you can “pierce the fog” surrounding the information in the everyday national media.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The difference between progressives and conservatives

Quote

“The liberal sees outer, removable institutions as the ultimate source of evil; sees man’s social task as creating a world in which evil will disappear. His tools for this task are progress and enlightenment. The conservative sees the inner unremovable nature of man as the ultimate source of evil; sees man’s social task as coming to terms with a world in which evil is perpetual and in which justice and compassion will both be perpetually necessary. His tools for this task are the maintenance of ethical restraints inside the individual and the maintenance of unbroken, continuous social patterns inside the given culture as a whole. Hence, the conservative distrusts direct democracy, unrestrained and unpatterned”

Peter Viereck

 h/t: Dover Beach

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.8/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)

Edmund Burke’s conservatism.

Quote

…we have made no discoveries, and we think that no discoveries are to be made, in morality; not many in the great principles of government, nor in the ideas of liberty, which were understood long before we were born, altogether as well as they will be after the grave has heaped its mould upon our presumption, and the silent tomb shall have imposed its law on our pert loquacity.

- Edmund Burke, Reflections On The French Revolution

h/t Dover Beach

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Source of Moral Goodness in Society

Quote

(Public Discourse)

The legal institutions of a democratic and capitalist society are not designed to give people what is good and prevent them from getting what is bad; they are designed to give people what they want and not give them what they don’t want. For this reason, some people decry capitalism and democracy as amoral. Such views are misguided. In a democratic and capitalist society, there is a certain division of labor: it is up to the people themselves to become moral individuals with moral desires, while the political and economic institutions of the society implement the individuals’ aggregated desires. In any alternative system, there are institutions not accountable to the people and powerful enough to impose their will (really the will of the individuals who control the institutions) on everyone who disagrees with them. The historical record of such institutions has been terrifying, which is the best argument in favor of democratic capitalism. It is true that, in such a system, it may be harder to be moral when your understanding of morality is different from the majority view, but at least you will not often be forced into doing what you think is wrong. You may be seduced, but you will not be coerced. Democratic capitalism is a moral system, but in this system the guardians of morality are not institutions but the people themselves. Thus we read in the Book of Wisdom, A large number of wise men is the safety of the world.

 

Robert T. Miller is a Professor of Law at Villanova University, and as of August 2012 he will be a Professor of Law and Sandler Faculty Fellow of Corporate Law at the University of Iowa.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Eucharist and the American Ideal

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Emma Lazarus (1883), The New Colossus

h/t: Fr Peter-Michael Preble

To be sure because we live in a fallen world and because we are part of a sinful humanity, we will always fall short not only of the glory of God as the Apostle says (see Romans 3:23) but even of those ideals which we call our own.

And to this we must add the constant temptation to twist our ideals–and God’s glory–to our own selfish ends. And if this is true for the whole human family how can it be any less true for the American People?

As a People and as a Nation it is good to remember on Independence Day that we are bound not by blood or soil but by the ideals reflected in Emma Lazarus’s poem The New Colossus. The aspirations it extols are noble ones and seen from a certain angle they are deeply consonant with the celebration of the Eucharist.

It is in the Eucharist that common things are made sublime and the merely created comes to burn and shine with the Divine fire. Likewise America strives to ennoble the common man, to allow his dignity to shine through but without that “storied pomp” that so easily distracts us from our shared dignity as creatures created in God’s image and called to live in His likeness.

But it is precisely here, in America’s close parallel to humanity’s Eucharistic potential that we see not only what is most noble in America but also the source of our greatest temptations. No matter how closely the American ideal comes to the Eucharist, it is only through the latter that “the many” can hope to become, as the American motto (E pluribus unum) has it, “one.” In this life it is only in the Eucharist that many become one and do so in such a manner that the dignity and uniqueness of each person is able to shine forth in harmony with the common good.

But even in the Eucharist this harmony of person and community is fleeting. Not because of any lack in the Eucharist. Rather it is because just as the American ideal points beyond itself and is only fulfilled in this life in the Eucharist, so too our celebration of the Eucharist points beyond itself and is fulfilled only in the Kingdom of God.

The relationship here is like what we see in Hebrews. America, the Eucharist and the Kingdom are in turn the shadow, the image and the reality (see Hebrew 10:1). America’s political genius is our willing embrace to be governed humbly. We purposefully established a limited government to safe guard the rights of a people who understand that the good things we embrace and the life we seek to foster is only a relative good.

The goodness of America and the American People is (as our critics will often remind us in a disparaging and condescending tone) a derivative good. We are only good by participation not nature.

And our temptation?

On the one hand, it is the common temptation of all humanity, of each nation and every person. To forget that to the degree that we are good at all, we are si because of God’s benevolence not our own efforts. The goodness of America and the American People that Lazarus lauds in her poem are the fruit of our personal and shared obedience to the law of nature and nature’s God.

And so, on the other hand, we find ourselves always tempted to forget that though our ideals are not uniquely ours but common to all humanity.  And these ideals can’t be imposed without thereby violating them. While evil can be limited by force, goodness can only be embraced freely, without coercion.

So happy Fourth of July America!

But never forget that what we have we have as a gift from a loving God. We are merely the stewards of this gift, not its master much less its source.  We can’t be ourselves if we forget that this gift, like all God’s gifts, comes with the heavy responsibility of obedience–personal and national–to God’s will.

At its best our polity points beyond itself, in this life, to the Eucharist and, in the Eucharist, to that Kingdom which is to come.

And at its, or rather, our worst?

Well, we are at our lowest when we think highly of ourselves. We are never so bad at being Americans as when we fail to remember that we are at best only “an almost chosen people” whose best belongs not to us but to God.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)