Christian Values Aren’t Enough

Parents who raise their children with nothing more

English: Christus Pantocrator in the apsis of ...

Christus Pantocrator in the apsis of the cathedral of Cefalù.

than Christian values should not be surprised when their children abandon those values. If the child or young person does not have a firm commitment to Christ and the truth of the Christian faith, the values will have no binding authority, nor should we expect that they would. Most of our neighbors have some commitment to Christian values, but what they desperately need is salvation from their sins. That does not come by Christian values, no matter how fervently held. Salvation comes only by the Gospel of 

Jesus Christ.

Human beings are natural-born moralists, and moralism is the most potent of all the false gospels. The language of “values” is the language of moralism and cultural Protestantism — what the Germans called Kulturprotestantismus. This is the religion that produces cultural Christians, and cultural Christianity soon dissipates into atheism, agnosticism, and other forms of non-belief. Cultural Christianity is the great denomination of moralism, and far too many church folk fail to recognize that their own religion is just Cultural Christianity — not the genuine Christian faith

Read more  Albert Mohler.

Substitute “Cultural Orthodoxy” for “Cultural Christianity” and I think it applies. Does this mean that culture doesn’t matter or that we shouldn’t work to bring society into a ever closer harmony with the Gospel? Of course not! Important, essential really, though culture is, it is not sufficient for salvation. And this applies to both those Orthodox Christians who are cultural conservatives as well as to those who are cultural progressives. That I can justify theologically my cultural or political views is not to suggest that these views exhaust the mystery of salvation. Rather the best I can say is that my views are compatible with the Gospel.

Thoughts?

In Christ,+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Democratic Platform Includes Free Abortions, Official ‘Gay Marriage’ Support

Quote

(Source: Catholics For The Common Good).

By Michelle Bauman

Charlotte, NC, Sep 5, 2012 (CNA/EWTN News)– For the first time in American history, a major U.S. political party has incorporated support for a redefinition of marriage into its official statement of beliefs.

The Democratic Party’s platform, formally adopted at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. on Sept. 4, supports “marriage equality,” a phrase used by those who wish to redefine marriage to include homosexual couples.

The platform, which outlines the party’s official views on a variety of subjects, called for the full repeal of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman for federal purposes and protects states from being forced to recognize the gay unions of other states.

It also called for the passage of the so-called Respect for Marriage Act, which would require the federal government to recognize same-sex “marriages.”

While the document voiced support for the freedom of “churches and religious entities” to determine how “marriage as a religious sacrament” should be administered, it did not include any mention of individuals or groups that hold religious objections to recognizing and supporting civil marriage.

It also noted that the administration has redefined the word “family” in immigration regulations to include homosexual relationships.

Affirming its support of abortion with no restrictions, a redefinition of marriage and free birth control for all women, the Democratic Party said in its official statement of positions that it is committed to “pursuing policies that truly value families.”

The platform also recognized the importance of good fathers and noted President Obama’s initiatives to support and encourage fatherhood.

“We all have a stake in forging stronger bonds between fathers and their children,” it said.

The president has drawn criticism for acknowledging the irreplaceable role of fathers while at the same time undermining this important role by supporting “same-sex marriage,” which renders fathers unnecessary and optional.

The Democratic platform also removed references to “God” but noted that faith-based organizations have played a “central” role throughout American history. It called for “constitutionally sound, evidence-based partnerships with faith-based and other non-profit organizations to serve those in need and advance our shared interests.”

“There is no conflict between supporting faith-based institutions and respecting our Constitution,” the document said, “and a full commitment to both principles is essential for the continued flourishing of both faith and country.”

At the same time, the party voiced its support for the controversial federal mandate that requires employers to offer health care plans that include free contraception, sterilization and early abortion-inducing drugs, even if doing so violates their consciences.

Widely criticized for its infringement upon conscience rights and freedom of religion, the mandate has drawn the opposition of individuals and organizations from across the religious and political spectrum, including objections from bishops in every Catholic diocese in the U.S.

However, the Democratic Party’s official statement of beliefs argued that the president “has respected the principle of religious liberty” in promoting “affordable family planning services.”

The party reiterated its commitment to “safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay” and opposed any restrictions or attempts to “weaken or undermine that right.”

In addition, it observed that Obama issued an executive order to repeal restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research and voiced support for “evidence-based and age-appropriate sex education,” although it did not elaborate on which types of sex education it considers to meet these criteria.

The platform also said that America must advance its “core set of universal values” around the world.

“President Obama and the Democratic Party are committed to supporting family planning around the globe,” it said, highlighting the president’s decision to overturn the Mexico City Policy, which bans U.S. funds from supporting foreign family planning groups that promote or perform abortions.

Insisting that “gay rights are human rights,” the party also said that the State Department is currently “funding a program that finances gay rights organizations” and vowed to “actively combat” the actions of other nations that it believes are engaged in “discrimination.”

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post-Religious Thinking

Quote

David Gelernter, the Yale professor of computer science, has an alarming yet cautiously exuberant book out, America-Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered In the Obamacrats). He tells us where we are and how and why we got here, and gives readers a pep talk,   encouraging them to be the light (not “lite”) we need. He talks about it all with National Review Online’s Kathryn Jean Lopez.

LOPEZ: Why is that “post-religion” bit so important?

GELERNTER: Post-religious thinkers don’t even live on the same spiritual planet as Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish Americans. Old-time atheists struggled with biblical religion and rejected it; modern post-religious thinkers struggled with nothing. Since the Bible and biblical religion underlie the invention of America, it’s hard (unsurprisingly) for post-religious people to understand America sympathetically. Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural, the most sacred of American texts, is (precisely) a sermon describing North and South as equally guilty in God’s eyes for the sin of slavery and, ultimately, for the war itself:

Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said, “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

The quote is from Psalms 19; Reagan’s famous “shining city on a hill” paraphrases the gospels. Expecting post-religious, Bible-ignorant thinkers to grasp America is like expecting a gerbil to sing Pagliacci. The gerbil might be brilliant in his way, but he’ll never make it in opera. (If this be species-ism, make the most of it!) How can my post-religious colleagues and countrymen, many of whom have never even opened a Bible, understand Lincoln or America or Americans?

Read the whole interview here” Dismantling of a Culture.

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The Declaration of Independence Annotated

Quote

Some more thoughts for Independence Day:

 “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The most famous line of the Declaration.  On the one hand, this will become a great embarrassment to a people who permitted slavery.  On the other hand making public claims like this has consequences—that’s why people make them publicly.  To be held for account.    And this promise will provide the heart of the abolitionists case in the Nineteenth Century, which is why late defenders of slavery eventually came to reject the Declaration.

What are “unalienable,” or more commonly, “inalienable rights”?  Inalienable rights are those you cannot give up even if you want to and consent.  Unlike other alienable rights that you can consent to transfer or waive.  Why inalienable rights?  The Founders want to counter England’s claim that by accepting the colonial governance, the colonists had alienated their rights.  The Framers claimed that with inalienable rights, you always retain the ability to take back any right that has been given up.

The standard trilogy throughout this period was “life, liberty, and property.”  For example, the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress (1774) read:   “That the inhabitants of the English colonies in North-America, by the immutable laws of nature, the principles of the English constitution, and the several charters or compacts, have the following RIGHTS:  Resolved, 1. That they are entitled to life, liberty and property: and they have never ceded to any foreign power whatever, a right to dispose of either without their consent.”  Or, as John Locke wrote, “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.”

Perhaps the most commonly repeated formulation was found in the Virginia Declaration of Rights of May 15, 1776 drafted by George Mason: “That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, . . . namely the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.”  The switch from property to “pursuit of happiness” came at the last minute of the drafting process.  The exact reason for change is not clear.

The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition:  “first comes rights, then comes government.”  According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation;  (2) The protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) Even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights — or its systematice violation of rights — can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) At least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so.  This is powerful stuff.

 

Powerful stuff indeed. Read the whole thing here: The Volokh Conspiracy.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

The Eucharist and the American Ideal

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Emma Lazarus (1883), The New Colossus

h/t: Fr Peter-Michael Preble

To be sure because we live in a fallen world and because we are part of a sinful humanity, we will always fall short not only of the glory of God as the Apostle says (see Romans 3:23) but even of those ideals which we call our own.

And to this we must add the constant temptation to twist our ideals–and God’s glory–to our own selfish ends. And if this is true for the whole human family how can it be any less true for the American People?

As a People and as a Nation it is good to remember on Independence Day that we are bound not by blood or soil but by the ideals reflected in Emma Lazarus’s poem The New Colossus. The aspirations it extols are noble ones and seen from a certain angle they are deeply consonant with the celebration of the Eucharist.

It is in the Eucharist that common things are made sublime and the merely created comes to burn and shine with the Divine fire. Likewise America strives to ennoble the common man, to allow his dignity to shine through but without that “storied pomp” that so easily distracts us from our shared dignity as creatures created in God’s image and called to live in His likeness.

But it is precisely here, in America’s close parallel to humanity’s Eucharistic potential that we see not only what is most noble in America but also the source of our greatest temptations. No matter how closely the American ideal comes to the Eucharist, it is only through the latter that “the many” can hope to become, as the American motto (E pluribus unum) has it, “one.” In this life it is only in the Eucharist that many become one and do so in such a manner that the dignity and uniqueness of each person is able to shine forth in harmony with the common good.

But even in the Eucharist this harmony of person and community is fleeting. Not because of any lack in the Eucharist. Rather it is because just as the American ideal points beyond itself and is only fulfilled in this life in the Eucharist, so too our celebration of the Eucharist points beyond itself and is fulfilled only in the Kingdom of God.

The relationship here is like what we see in Hebrews. America, the Eucharist and the Kingdom are in turn the shadow, the image and the reality (see Hebrew 10:1). America’s political genius is our willing embrace to be governed humbly. We purposefully established a limited government to safe guard the rights of a people who understand that the good things we embrace and the life we seek to foster is only a relative good.

The goodness of America and the American People is (as our critics will often remind us in a disparaging and condescending tone) a derivative good. We are only good by participation not nature.

And our temptation?

On the one hand, it is the common temptation of all humanity, of each nation and every person. To forget that to the degree that we are good at all, we are si because of God’s benevolence not our own efforts. The goodness of America and the American People that Lazarus lauds in her poem are the fruit of our personal and shared obedience to the law of nature and nature’s God.

And so, on the other hand, we find ourselves always tempted to forget that though our ideals are not uniquely ours but common to all humanity.  And these ideals can’t be imposed without thereby violating them. While evil can be limited by force, goodness can only be embraced freely, without coercion.

So happy Fourth of July America!

But never forget that what we have we have as a gift from a loving God. We are merely the stewards of this gift, not its master much less its source.  We can’t be ourselves if we forget that this gift, like all God’s gifts, comes with the heavy responsibility of obedience–personal and national–to God’s will.

At its best our polity points beyond itself, in this life, to the Eucharist and, in the Eucharist, to that Kingdom which is to come.

And at its, or rather, our worst?

Well, we are at our lowest when we think highly of ourselves. We are never so bad at being Americans as when we fail to remember that we are at best only “an almost chosen people” whose best belongs not to us but to God.

In Christ,

+Fr Gregory

Enhanced by Zemanta
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

On Our Cultural Failings

Thank you to Fr Hans Jacobse for his recent essay (Catholic Online: The Republic is Finished and the America We Knew is Gone) and for the many thoughtful comments it has inspired.

As to whether or not the latest decision of the SCOTUS supporting the constitutionality of the Patient Affordability Act is the end of the Republic or not I can’t say. If however our’ Republic is rooted in virtue understood as the fruit of human obedience to Natural Law then this needn’t be the end. In fact since virtue grows best in adversity I see this as a potentially good thing since it might inspire just the moral awakening and cultural renewal that America needs.  On the other hand, if our Republic is not really and truly rooted in virtue and obedience to “the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” then we are better off for the loss and of our pretense to being a virtuous and “almost chosen people.”

Contrary to what some might want to believe, the Public Square and American culture were not taken by the forces of moral corruption. Rather I think we are where we are as a People became we became complacent, we withdrew from the Public Square and the culture. We forget that vice is not a real thing but the absence of virtue, of those habits of thought and action that make human flourishing possible.

Vice never wins. Continue reading

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 7.8/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: +2 (from 4 votes)